The study of light
began with Newton who started by assuming that light is made up of particles, themselves
invisible, which he called corpuscles. On the basis of this hypothesis, he could explain
the formation of images, reflection and refraction. But one phenomena that he himself
noticed, which is also named after him as Newtons rings, could not be explained using
his corpuscular nature of light theory.
To explain the formation
of Newtons rings and many other phenomena classified under Interference, Diffraction
and Polarization, light was hypothesized to be a wave. This hypothesis, first propounded
by Christian Huygens could correctly explain not only these phenomena but also
reflection, refraction and other phenomena that could not be explained by Newtons
theory. Hence Huygens wave theory of light was preferred over Newtons
corpuscular theory.
The concept of Huygens theory was that each point along a ray
behaves like a light source emitting light in all directions. The locus of all points of
the light wave that are in the same phase is called wavefront. The waves emitted by each
point were called secondary wavefronts. Huygens wave theory could explain
only Interference and Diffraction of light but not Polarisation which was explained by
Fresnel who consequently proved that light was a transverse wave.
In fact, Polarisation
settled the doubts about the nature of light being a transverse wave once and for all. But
the question what kind of waves make up light? still remained.Olaf
Roemer had first
measured the speed of light using the eclipses of Jupiters moons as early as 1675.
His measurement ( 2.000000 x 108 m/s) was amazingly close to the now known
value of the speed of light - 2.9979250 x 108 m/s, considering the rather
primitive equipment used. This value was modified by many other experiments. It was only
sometime in the late 19th century, however, that its significance was realised.
This was first noticed by James Clerk Maxwell who had unified Electricity and Magnetism as
one phenomena under Electromagnetic theory. He had also proved that electrical and
magnetic field fluctuations produced by moving charged particles travel as electromagnetic
waves. He calculated their speed, in vacuum, to be nearly the velocity of light in vacuum.
He presumed this to be no mere coincidence and suggested that light could be an
electromagnetic wave.
This was tested and proved correct by Heinrich Hertz sometime in
1885. Thus Maxwells electromagnetic theory could answer the long standing question
about the nature of light - they were electromagnetic: produced by charged particles in
motion. It was left to Einstein to prove that electromagnetic waves travel in vacuum
overthrowing the long held belief that electromagnetic waves required a
medium (ether) to
propagate.
But there were more
surprises to come.
It was early in the 20th
century when a new phenomena was discovered - photoelectric effect. The explanation of
photoelectric effect by Einstein and the explanation of Blackbody radiation by Max Planck
cast doubts over the electromagnetic wave theory of light. Both these new discoveries
required light to be made up of particles called as photons - not exactly the
kind of particles that Newton had in mind, though. Indeed, in the process of explaining
Blackbody radiation Planck had to assume that energy of electromagnetic radiation itself
(be it heat or light or any form of radiation) is made up of particles** called
as quanta (quantum - singular), beginning a new study in Physics called Quantum Mechanics.
Physicists werent late in realising that light probably had a dual
nature; it behaved as if it was made up of particles (photons) under certain conditions and it also behaved
like a wave under different conditions. Thus the dual nature of light theory
was born and continues to be accepted even today.
** As a matter of fact
these are not particles as we usually understand, like particles of
dust.
These are discrete amounts of energy and energies less than this particular amount
(which is decided on certain other factors) do not even exist ! (for a given frequency ).
As a crude analogy, imagine an amount of Rs. 100 which is made up of 100 paise, each paise
being the smallest permissible amount. An amount less than one paise may be imagined but
they simply do not exist. Each paise is, in energy terms, a quantum of energy.
|